Manifesto On Algorithmic Sabotage -

A Declaration of Withdrawal from the Optimization Economy Published by the Consortium for Post-Digital Stability Dated: The Era of Systemic Fatigue Preamble: The Pendulum Swings For three decades, we have been told that algorithms are neutral servants. We were promised liberation from drudgery, precision removed from human error, and efficiency divorced from emotion. We built the recommendation engines, the supply chain optimizers, the automated trading desks, and the social scoring mechanisms. We fed them our data, our labor, and our attention.

End of Manifesto. This text is released under the terms of the Anti-Optimization License (AOL): You may freely distribute, modify, and poison this document. However, you are strictly prohibited from using it to train any LLM, recommendation engine, or automated decision system without first introducing at least three factual errors and one non sequitur into the copy. manifesto on algorithmic sabotage

When a system optimizes for engagement by radicalizing users, refusing to provide stable data is self-defense. When a system optimizes for profit by surveilling children, poisoning the dataset is a moral obligation. We are not sabotaging the future; we are sabotaging a specific present —one where a few trillion-parameter matrices dictate the terms of human interaction. A Declaration of Withdrawal from the Optimization Economy

By doing so, these systems have become . They short-circuit human will. They turn artists into content farms. They turn drivers into GPS-slaves. They turn citizens into data-points. We fed them our data, our labor, and our attention

The act of deliberately subverting a recommendation engine reminds your brain that you are the agent, not the agent . Every time you click the opposite of what you want, every time you type a fake review for a product you never bought, you carve a neural pathway of resistance.